Showing posts with label consumer insights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label consumer insights. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

In Time of Scrimping, Fun Stuff Is Still Selling

By and



With a flat job market and an economy that will not improve, Americans are once again buckling down and cutting back.


At least on the things that they can resist.


Consumers at all income levels have been splurging on indulgences while paring many humdrum household expenses, according to industry data for the last year. Many retailers also report that while fripperies like purses and perfumes are best sellers, they cannot get shoppers interested in basics like diapers, socks and vacuum bags.


“My birthday is coming up, so I’m treating myself,” said Ragan Belton, a social worker leaving the Macy’s in Manhattan with newly styled hair and a pair of shoes.


Consumer psychologists say that in this uncertain economy — coming after one of the worst recessions in generations — it is just too hard being good all the time.


“People have a limited supply of energy to put toward controlling their urges,” Kathleen D. Vohs, a professor of marketing at the University of Minnesota, said in an e-mail. Ms. Vohs studies spending behavior at the university’s Carlson School of Management.


Many of the products selling briskly are not high-priced, but they could be on a party supply list: premixed cocktails and coolers, cheesecake, cosmetics and wine. Meanwhile, sales of staples like batteries, bleach and fertilizer have declined sharply.


The pattern has shifted since the recession, when shoppers stocked up on basics but consumer spending and overall retail sales plummeted. Now, despite persistent consumer pessimism, spending is holding up, retailers have posted consistent profits and some companies that make the fun stuff are reporting especially strong results.


The cosmetics maker Estée Lauder, for example, announced last month that it had recorded its strongest fiscal year in North America in a decade, and a competitor, L’Oréal, said its first-half net profit was up 12 percent from a year ago. Last week, a crush of shoppers hoping to buy a cheaper line of Missoni fashions at Target brought down the retailer’s Web site for the better part of a day.


“When the crisis hit and people really started to feel a pinch in their pocketbooks, they started to spend less across the board, especially in discretionary kinds of things,” said Vicki G. Morwitz, a professor of marketing at the Stern School of Business at New York University. “But it’s difficult, I think, for people to do that for a long time, even when they need to.”


Economists say the spending does not translate into a broader shift in consumer confidence, nor does it point to an economic revival. In the long run, basics are the bread and butter of retailing, and when they slump, the industry as a whole eventually feels the pinch. Also, some analysts say, many shoppers remain price-conscious, even about their indulgences. That means they tend to gravitate toward cheaper imports, which might help on the retail employment front but does not create manufacturing jobs domestically.


“The toughest businesses, frankly, have been in the middle of the basics assortments,” Myron E. Ullman III, chairman and chief executive of J. C. Penney, told investors last month, referring to clothing staples. In the company’s second quarter, shoes, handbags and jewelry were top sellers.
At Kohl’s, similar categories — watches, handbags and women’s shoes — were among the strong sellers in the second quarter.


“The psychology of the customer is you can — I hate to sound too esoteric here — but you can improve your outfit or dress up your outfit without buying a new outfit by buying a new handbag,” said Kevin Mansell, chief executive of Kohl’s. “It makes people feel better.”


Unit sales of premade cocktails and coolers, which declined in the first two years of the recession, have jumped 24 percent in the last year. A similar pattern holds with many other indulgent items, which dropped in sales when the recession hit. In the last year, though, sales of body scrubbers jumped 21 percent, cosmetic accessories rose 22 percent and nail polish rose 10 percent. Refrigerated baked goods were up 16 percent, and wine 6 percent. The figures come from SymphonyIRI Group, a market research firm in Chicago, that tracked sales at most major stores, excluding Wal-Mart, for the 52 weeks ending July 10.


“In a poor economy, at any given moment people are more likely to have problems with self-control than otherwise — because there’s only so far their self-control energy can be stretched,” said Ms. Vohs, the professor of marketing.


Some of the products that declined are associated with household chores. Fertilizer and weed killer dropped 19 percent, as did vacuum bags. Thermometers declined by 20 percent, and flashlights and batteries by 10 percent. Diapers, bleach, shoe polish, car wax and socks are also on a downward trajectory, the data shows. Of course, not all products fit neatly into these trends. Experts are still pondering the run on meat pies, the sales of which jumped 15 percent.
People interviewed about their shopping practices sounded as if they had grown tired of budgeting. Ms. Belton, the shopper at Macy’s, said that she had curtailed spending as her hours and pay decreased, but that she needed a break from the austerity. “This was one of the first times shopping in six months,” she said.


Outside a Sephora store in Times Square, Angela Spencer, 50, said, “I may not buy as much, but I accessorize more.” She splurges, she said, “only if I really got to have it.”


One thriving category in the treat-yourself economy has been cheesecake, with sales rising 22 percent in the last year, according to the SymphonyIRI data.


At Junior’s Cheesecake, a Brooklyn-based restaurant and cheesecake store, a co-founder, Alan Rosen, said sales at the 61-year-old company were increasing again after dropping for the first time ever during the recession.


“People want to get back to living — it’s become a more adjusted normal,” he said.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Romancing the consumer

March 15, 2011

Wendy Cukier

Go to article

My how the world has changed. I am a boomer. My first phone was black with a rotary dial, provided by Bell Canada for a few dollars a month. To get the beautiful pink princess phone I coveted for my girly bedroom, we would have had to pay extra. For touch tone, another fee.

A Canadian Radio-Television Telecommunications (CRTC) decision in 1982 made it legal to purchase a phone and plug it into the network, and 10 years later we got competing telecommunications providers.

The first “cellular” phones were the size of a cinder block and the first cellular “flip-phone” introduced by Motorola cost more than $1,500.

During my formative years, there was little choice in communications technology and services — in marked contrast to today’s wide array of phones in every imaginable colour, with every imaginable feature and pricing based on flat fees, usage-based fees, location-based fees or almost any combination.

Faced with this amazing and every-changing smorgasbord, it has become clear that the weird and wonderful thing about today’s consumers is that functionality is necessary but insufficient to win their hearts and minds.

Innovators need to intimately understand how technology is, can, or might be used by people, how to add value (real or perceived) and how to shape those perceptions and adapt to them. And they have to recognize that what people say they want may not be what they will use — who ever admitted that porn would be their principal use for the Internet?

These processes are highly iterative. Technology is not just bits and bites but complex social practices.

Consider the breathtakingly funny but profane “iphone4 vs. HTC Evo” YouTube video. A customer tells the salesperson she wants an iPhone4. He offers her a HTC Evo with superior functionality (bigger screen, higher speed, replaceable battery and lower cost.) At every point, she says “I don’t care.”

“If it’s not an iPhone, why would I want it?”

Salesperson: “It %^%$#$ prints money.”

Customer: “I don’t care.”

Salesperson: “It will grant you three wishes, even if one of those wishes is for an iPhone.”

Customer: “I don’t care.”

And so on. . .

Objectively speaking, it may be true that other devices have the same or better functionality than the iPhone4. But, fundamentally, adoption of technology has little to do with rational decisions about functions and features.

Perhaps no device in modern history has engendered the same deep emotional attachment as the iPhone — it has 100 million units sold to prove it. The iPhone is not just a device, it is part of a lifestyle, or an identity. It represents the height of technology fashion. It is sleek and beautiful.

With technology, as with romance, the heart wants what the heart wants, and winning consumer hearts is often more important than winning their minds. Technology developers who unlock the secrets of romancing customers, who understand the role of aesthetics and brand and identity and behaviour, are more likely to succeed.

To push technology to market in the not too distant past, it was enough to be more powerful, faster, smaller or feature-rich. Now consumer needs and wants — however weird and wonderful or “irrational” they may seem — drive market growth and innovation.

The pace of change is mind-boggling. Among the top 20 websites in 2010, five — Facebook, YouTube, Blogger, Twitter and Wikipedia — were not even on the list in 2005. How can technology providers plan when they cannot predict or even glimpse the trends that will rule the market in five years?

Smart companies are learning how to shape those needs and wants, and consumer decision-making processes, by intense engagement with consumers.

The secrets of Apple’s success are certainly complex and difficult to emulate but it has been a game changer. Of course it has been building its brand for almost 30 years — many kids grew up with Apple. But the company has managed to grow beyond the hard-core enthusiasts. Its products are complete solutions — hardware, software, content — with consistent look and feel, strengthening customer engagement and loyalty.

The brand is extremely powerful — virtually synonymous with “hip.” It has been brought into the mainstream with brilliant use of both traditional and emerging media.

But the foundation is its focus on shaping the customer experience on multiple levels. Certainly the functionality is there, but the emotional and aesthetic appeal is what give it staying power.

As Steve Chazin, former Apple marketing executive, has noted with respect to the runaway success of the iPod, “Apple isn’t selling you an MP3 player. They are inviting you to experience the Apple lifestyle and to become part of the iPod community. Use any other MP3 player and you’ll hear good music. Use an iPod and you’ll feel good. You’ll fit in. Product features don’t create fans.” Understanding the psyche of consumers and their very identities is critical.

And given the increasing importance of aesthetics and consumer behaviour to technology design, it is no surprise that educational institutions are trying to build cross-disciplinary programs and teams that harken back to the heady days of Xerox’s famous research Parc in Palo Alto, California.

Sunday, February 27, 2011

Is 2011 The Year for Semantic Technology?


Information Management Newsletters, February 24, 2011

Luca Scagliarini

Go to article


Consider the following facts:

  • 79 percent of American adults use the Internet, according to a May 2010 survey.
  • 38 percent of Internet users log onto an online networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn each day.
  • 8 percent of Americans on the Internet use Twitter.
  • 28 percent of Internet users look for information online each day about a service or product they are thinking of buying. (Stats from the Pew Research Center.)

It’s crucial for institutions of all kinds to have a pulse on the public’s opinion regarding relevant issues, products and ideas. Still, modern technology has made the extraction and utilization of this information and related opinions more difficult than ever. From chat rooms to Twitter, Facebook and blogs, there is an ever-growing amount content from which many of us are trying to separate the useful insight from the weeds. The advent of chief listening officers in the corporate world only reinforces the desire to keep tabs on customer dialogue and sentiment in an effort to protect brand reputation and keep customers happy.

Is Facebook Driving Adoption?

Currently, most companies don’t have the time to invest in analyzing the mass of social information on the Web. This is where semantic technology comes into play. At its most basic level, semantic technology is able to understand the meanings of words expressed in their proper context no matter the number (singular or plural), gender, verb tense or mode (indicative or imperative). But this is just the starting point. Semantic technology incorporates morphological, logical, grammatical and natural language analysis that translates into higher precision and recall when searching for information, delivering all of the most important and accurate data to the user.

Semantic technology allows enterprises to monitor and assess information contained in Web-based conversations and unstructured information so that companies can get the lay of the land when it comes to overall sentiment. And while the enterprise is gradually adopting semantic technologies, the consumer realm has a mind of its own.

Decisions by major companies, particularly those like Facebook, to acquire semantic technology companies seem to point to a move toward more widespread semantic technology adoption. Facebook is a kind of parallel Web universe, with its own content, search functions, applications and games. It has content of every type and of every quality, so it’s necessary to render that content more useful in an effective and realistic way.

Also, companies that need insight on public opinion about a particular topic can rely on semantic technology to pull together relevant search results that accurately reflect the comments, tweets and posts about that product, idea or issue. Given these capabilities, it’s clear why Facebook sees such value in adding semantic analysis into its own search function. As the king of the social networks, with more users than Google, Facebook does not have to be in agreement with anyone regarding formats, ontologies, tags or concepts when it comes to semantic search. Because of this, Facebook can define its own standards and impose them on its users, putting it in a privileged position to start applying semantic technology to its own content beyond the “Like” feature. With a gradual, focused process, semantic search will prove both interesting and useful for Facebook and its users in the future.

Potential in the Enterprise

Nowhere is there greater potential for semantic technology than in the enterprise, especially as companies increasingly understand the value and impact of critical information coming from outside the organization via social media outlets. This information, in the form of unstructured data – comments on blogs and discussion forums, independent reviews, posts on Twitter, Facebook, etc. – has a great ability to influence the enterprise. It represents intelligence that, when coupled with internal data, can signal significant benefits for the bottom line.

With its functionality and ability to integrate structured and unstructured data, semantic technology supports corporate knowledge management and business intelligence efforts, especially in the areas of:

Customer service. Semantic technology helps companies analyze the conversations customers are having on the Web and provides useful insight in relation to overall customer needs. When it comes to interacting with call centers and online support, it provides an even greater customer service reach to provide immediate, thorough response to customer queries.

Competitive monitoring. Semantic technology helps companies take listening abilities one step further by capturing and analyzing the online opinions of users, understanding not only what is being discussed, but how it is being discussed. This enables companies to keep tabs on the latest information from competitors, as well as the reactions customers are having in response to competitive news.

Research and development. For organizations with a large focus on and investment in R&D, semantic technology’s ability to integrate structured and unstructured data enables organizations to share important data and manage a tremendous amount of information. This makes it an invaluable resource.

At its simplest, semantic technology is a listening technology; at its most complex, semantics support critical business decision-making. The fact is semantic technology helps break through information boundaries contained between business walls and the insight culled from the vast web of Internet consumers.

What’s Ahead for Semantic Technology?

Semantic technology will increasingly be recognized as a tool that helps provide early identification and analysis of consumer sentiment, purchasing trends, market deals and competitive information. Moving forward, monitoring social media-focused comments and conversations will be a core part of any business. By uncovering information in its true context and form, organizations will be able to strategize, analyze and make smarter predictions.

In the coming year, I think three trends will dominate the social semantic sphere:

  1. A higher value (and in turn an increased investment) will be placed on the ability to gather a dynamic, more accurate real-time view of the market.
  2. Traditional market research will begin to permanently incorporate social media influence through the use of semantic technology.
  3. An increased precision and quality in the search of social information will result as more companies enter the semantic space in an attempt to tame the semantic Web.
What are your predictions for semantic technologies in the coming year, particularly as they relate to social media?